Animal Testing Pros and Cons Essay

living creature Testing Pros and Cons Essay1.0 IntroductionThe Greeks believed that living organisms were a lesser form of liveness beca engage wights could non think like gays did. Further much, this image was continued by Christians who cl roleed that animals were less signifi hobot be appargonnt motion they had no soul (Vivisection, 2002). fauna exam is the use of live animals for research in order to emend understand the effect of certain substances towards mankind health. This application has been widely carried step up in many industries. Numerous animals have been utilize for animal examen, such(prenominal) as guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs and mice. The slew of animal exam has be do a worldwide focus these days due to arguments brought up by those who atomic number 18 against animal proveation.Unquestionably, the practice of animal experimentation has increased tremendously comp ard to the past. fit in to Shandilya (2008), it is estimated that 20 million anim als be utilise for animal experimentation p.a. for the purpose of medicine and for test other products. Findings from studies indicate that less than 10 percent of pure psychological researches use animals as test domains, which do not include animal subjects used for cross-over health check experimentation (Ameri dope mental Association, n.d., cited in Harding, L. , 2001). However, there be some who state that animal experiments argon cruel and immoral, besides violating an animals rights. This has caused many individuals to agree with the movements of anti-vivisection organisations due to brutal manipulation towards animals.Although there atomic number 18 laws regarding animal testing enforcing the reduction in the use of animals for vivisection, opponents of animal experimenting be still debating ab tabu the subject of legalizing it.If we view this subject from a broader perspective, it lot be seen that animal testing should be decriminalised as it aids scientist in the discoveries of sassy drugs and discussions to make health and medicine better, an animals life does not hold as much value as a human beings, and it is the just about precise way to find out the effects of substances on a living organism.This research paper entrust explain why animal testing should be permitd. Research findings argon confined to the get together States of America, since the subject of animal testing is highly debated there and the progress of this issue in the US is relative to other countries.2.1 puppet testing seconds in the development of drugs and treatments.Currently, universe be often exposed to various diseases which are life threatening, which includes existing diseases or unsanded forms of diseases due to mutations and changes in the environment. Hence, research workers are working hard in finding cures for all these illnesses. From here, it mickle be seen that animal testing is essential in the sustenance of human health. zoologys will b e used to study the effect of unexampledly invented drugs, whether it will help in curing the disease.Speaking of the positive yields of animal testing, this includes the development of new medicine and treatments. Derbyshire (2004) mentioned that many medical advances used animal testing dogs were used to develop the production of insulin, whereas primates were utilized in the manufacture of a powerful anti-rejection drug, cyclosporine. at any rate this, discoveries of various vaccines have evolved through animal experimentation. From here, it can be seen that animal testing can guide us to discoveries of new knowledge about living organisms.Many drugs have been invented to fulfill the aim of remedying diseases. However, the side effects of newly invented drugs remain unknown. Therefore, animal testing allows the military rank of the danger of drugs in the beginning being used upon cosmos which will greatly reduce the risk before any human based trials are carried out (About An imal Testing, n.d.). Drugs that are tested safe can because be used to save millions of valuable human lives. The future of medical science still relies on animal testing, and this clearly shows a withdraw in legalizing animal testing.There are some large number who shoot that the effects of drugs tested on animals may not be the analogous to humans. Arthritis drug Vioxx, which caused 140 000 heart attacks and strokes in United States of America, was withdrawn from the globose market even though it appeared to be safe when tested in animals (Archibald, 2004). However, scientists have proven that animals are extremely alike to humans and experiments through with(p) on them would cook similar results obtained through future human experiments (About Animal Testing, n.d.). Hence, carrying out animal testing on drugs would improve the quality of human life indirectly.Therefore, to sum it all up, animal testing should be legalized because it assists researchers in medical treatmen ts besides drugs discovery, improves health and medicine and is able to test the gum elastic of drugs. Alternatives of animal testing are not as plausible as they are not as accurate as the results obtained from tests conducted upon animals. Hence, animal testing should be encouraged instead of being suppressed.2.2 The importance of human lives is accustomed priority over animal lives.Differences existing amongst humans and animals cause animals to receive treatments which are different and unequal although both of them are alive. As animals differ from humans as they do not have conscience, they are considered inferior to humans when it comes to the value of life. Seeing that the lives of humans are viewed as more(prenominal) valuable than animal lives, animals will have to be sacrificed in animal experimentation.The pros and cons of animal testing were debated with both sides being able to produce solid reasons for their stands. From the view of sentiency, it is mentioned that all living things are morally equivalent. However, the lives of humans are superior over the lives of animals (Garner, 2005). Authorities have to make a choice between the offbeat of humans and the welfare of animals. Which one is more important, the life of a human or the life of an animal? As Archibald (2004) heights out, most people are willing to sacrifice the lives of animal in animal testing to save human lives.Even though human welfare is the main concern, the welfare of an animal is still taken into card by minimizing the suffering of animals when conducting animal experimentations. The Animal Welfare Act had been form and reviewed constantly to protect animals and decrease the number of vivisections carried out (Monamy, 2000). Every experiment involving the usage of animals is normally administered with anesthesia. In conjunction with this, the experiments will not be repeated or animals used will be euthanized when brutal treatment is involved. Animal testing can be a ccepted as it allows the betterment of human life quality without the suffering of animals (Garner, 2005).Those who are against animal testing argued that animals have the right to live peacefully. Animal testing is regarded as cutting treatment towards animals as it violates animal rights as their lives are valuable as well (Le Fanu, 2003). Nevertheless, their arguments are weak because animals lack the sense of judgment, and therefore are not subjected to moral claims and animal rights (Cohen, 1986). Hence, they cannot be compared with human life. As tenacious as the animal is experimented upon without pain, the welfare of the animal is not violated. Therefore, it is acceptable to legalize the activity of animal testing as human life should be prioritized.Although there are many who are against animal experimentation, the points asserted are not h3 enough to discontinue the activity of animal testing. Supporters of animal testing affirm that animals should not have equal rights with humans as both of these cannot be compared. Animals lack the sense of judgment, thus human lives always come first before animal lives. Animals are considered to be protected as long as animals receive minimum amount of suffering. So animal testing should be legalized in order to save more human lives.2.3 Animal testing is helpful for studying the effects of substances.Many new chemical substances are produced either year to meet the demand of the worldwide market such as in agriculture, medicine and cosmetic products. The credit should be given to animal testing. The effect of that particular substance has been canvass to produce countless helpful products. This can increase the longevity of humans besides improving the human standard of living.By conducting experiments on animals, the researcher can gain invaluable information from the living specimen. Winston (2006) mentioned that 70% of the Nobel prizes for physiology or medicine are contributed from animal testing. Hen ce, it is clearly shown that by performing researches on animals by studying the effects of a substance can act a huge impact upon the world. The discovery of knowledge will be delayed or remain undiscovered if animal testing is not carried out.As stated by Le Fanu (2003), primates offer the surmount experimental models as they have 99% similarity in genes with humans. Animal testing can be carried out on primates to break the safety of some drugs before being tested on humans. The play for both organisms exhibiting the same effect is high due to the similarity of their genes. This in turn can reduce the risks faced by humans when commencing the trials. Hence, animals are good tools for learning the effects of various substances.In spite of this, people who are in opposition to animal testing argue that it mustiness not be legalized just because animal experimentation leads to medical breakthroughs and the outcome is more rewarding. This statement is insufficient to justify the drawbacks of animal testing (Derbyshire, 2004). On the other hand, it is proven that the beneficial outcome outweighs its drawbacks, so it is rational to legalize the activity of animal testing. Without studying the effects of substances using animal testing, most of the major vaccines against disease like polio, rubella and hepatitis B used instantly would not exist (Derbyshire, 2004). New drugs undergo in vitro research, computer stamp and animal testing before being tested on humans. Thus, every step is vital in this process of studying the effects before a drug is introduced into the market.In short, the effects of a substance can be study by carrying out animal testing which can provide invaluable information besides the anatomy of some animals are similar to humans. Even though animal experimentation its disadvantages, there are still many benefits that can gain by carrying out animal testing. Thus, legalization of animal testing must be accepted. Moreover, it can be a good tool for education and research purposes.3.0 RecommendationNormally, the usage of animals for animal testing delineated as cruelty towards animals and should not be legalized. However, it is impossible to ban the practice of animal experimentation due to the benefits brought by animal research towards mankind. Animal testing is a noble action at law to sustain the welfare of humans. Since the practice of animal testing cannot be stopped, the welfare of animals can only be protected by another approach.The pattern of Three Rs, that is refinement, reduction and replacement can be practiced. The researchers are sworn to reduce the number of animals used when performing a research. To use the least(prenominal) number of resources to obtain the fastest results, researchers have the tendency of using a smaller number of animals during their research. This is an act that showed the willingness of mankind to reduce the cruelty towards the animals. Besides this, scientists were asked to lessen the degree of suffering of the animal. This can be attained by exclude some needless harmful actions involving the animals. Lastly, alternative methods should be used whenever possible to replace the usage of animal testing (Derbyshire, 2006).For instance, the welfare of animals can be secured by doing so. The practice of animal experimentation should compromise between the welfare of humans and animals so that harmony can be achieved. Animal experimentation still can be practiced, and the laws should be strictly compel so that it is not violated by irresponsible people.4.0 Conclusion repayable to the increased usage of animal testing, the issue of animal experimentation is getting highly debated and remains relentless. After examining several points, it has revealed that animal testing should be legalized as it helps in the progress of medicine and health, human life is more valuable than animal life, and helps to learn the outcome of a substance on a living organism. Day by day, anti-vivisectionists try to rule out animal testing by looking at this issue from the animals point of view. Concurrently, supporters of animal experimentation were able to refute their arguments, by claiming the welfare of humans should always come first before animals. They viewed the subject of animal testing from a broader perspective and the long term advantages that come from animal experimentation. vivification is never perfect, some sacrifices have to make to achieve success for a better future. Nonetheless, animal research should be carried out as its advantages are more significant than the disadvantages.