A Website Review on the American Cultural History 1960-1969 Webpage Essay

Kingwood College Librarys Ameri can cultural History 1960-1969 webpage (http//kc subr let outine library. nhmccd. edu/decade60. html) is a webpage dedicated to the dessemination of nuance regarding the 1960s. It dubs itself a web and library guide, and is hosted and managed by the Kingwood College Library, an educational organization in Kingwood, Texas. Its give tongue to purpose is to help the user gain a broad intellect and appreciation for the culture and history of the 1960s (Goodwin, para. 2). The site itself is antecedented by Susan Goodwin. Unfortunately, no entropy in the site listed Ms.Goodwins credentials, and checking the Kingwood College Library for some(prenominal) information regarding the author proved futile as well. The webpage is primarily aimed for the oecumenic public, with information that is collected and compiled from different bloods which are mostly official or scholarly in nature (some information, however, are linked from Wikipedia, a source gener ally not accepted by the academia). As such, the information can be considered valid and true, and is presented clearly and matter-of-factly, without some(prenominal) embellishments or personal views and opinions, and without any technical jargon that may confuse the lay reader.At the pull up stakes of the page, the reader is immediately treated to a fact sheet of the decade, with securely facts about the population, the national debt, and the average salary, among others. Information is also placed in major categories, providing a coherent and easy to follow structure to the upstanding article. Since content is generally collected from the various sites off the internet and books, information and content ranges from the common to the not-so-common, but all are generally enkindle and well-presented.Most of the major points are presented as links which redirect to another(prenominal) website discussing that particular subject matter. This is where most of the webpages problems l ie, as a world-shattering number of links (25, to be exact) are either broken or non-existing, redirecting the reader to the main site instead. One of the links even redirects to the damage article. For an information-driven webpage run by an educational organization, such mistakes reflect poorly on the structure and management of the webpage itself.Another thing some people (especially researchers absentminded complete information) might have an issue with is how the webpage cites its sources. After each category, the author lists the books which have more information on the subjects presented in that category. However, the author did not list the specifics of the book, ie. , date of publication, author, actual page information, etc. For a researcher who needs these information, this is a great omission on a website that considers itself a bibliographic essay. Also, the website design can be improved as it is, it is presented in a simple and drab manner.Inspite of the faults st ated above, the webpage gives enough historical information and data for any general aspect of popular culture in the stated era. And with how it is presented, via links and redirects, the reader can just consociate on other links on the given website for more information about that particular subject matter. The webpages goal is to give out as much information as it can, in a telegraphic and direct manner. In this regard, it has succeeded rather well.ReferencesGoodwin, S. (2006). American Cultural History 1960-1969. Retrieved declination 20, 2007, from http//kclibrary. nhmccd. edu/decade60. html