Shakespeares Sonnet 116 :: William Shakespeare

LET ME NOT TO THE MARRIAGE OF TRUE MINDSBy William ShakespeareLet me not to the marriage of true minds (Sonnet 116) by William Shakespeare is ab break write out in its most ideal form. It is praising the glories of farers who have come to each other freely, and enter into a relationship based on self-reliance and understanding. Let me not the poem begins in the imperative mood. Its action is semantic and aims to delineate the allowable parameters of have sex and its goal appears to be air-tightness. The love I have in mind could be like a seamark or navigational guide to sailors, it is a north star. Like that star, it exceeds all delimit comprehension. Its height alone is sufficient to guide us. The poems ideal is unwavering faith, and it purports to bring about its own ideal. Odd then, isnt it, how much of the argument proceeds by mode of negation let me not, love is not, O no, and so forth. Perhaps the poet is less reassured than he appears to be. The first four lines reveal the poets pleasure in love that is constant and strong.?Which alter when it alteration finds. The following lines proclaim that true love is indeed an invariably fixed mark which will survive whatsoever(prenominal) crisis. In lines 7-8, the poet claims that we may be able to measure love to some degree, but this does not mean we fully understand it. Loves actual deserving cannot be known it remains a mystery. The remaining lines of the third quatrain (9-12), affirm the perfect nature of love that is unshakeable throughout time and remains so even to the edge of doom, or death. In the final couplet, the poet declares that, if he is mistaken about the constant, unmovable nature of perfect love, then he must take back all his writings on love, truth, and faith. Moreover, he adds that, if he has in fact judged love inappropriately, no man has ever really loved, in the ideal sense that the poet professes. In the sonnet, the chief hiatus in sense is after the twelf th line. Seventy-five per cent of the actors line are monosyllables. Only three contain more syllables than two, none cash in ones chips in any degree to the vocabulary of poetic diction. There is nothing to state about the rhyming except the happy blending of open and unsympathetic vowels, and nothing to say about the harmony except to point out how the fluttering accents in the quatrains give place in the couplet to the emphasised march of the almost unrelieved iambic feet.